Sunday, February 19, 2012

Singaporeans under attack by FT Indians 7: The worst racists in universe accuse Singaporeans racist

I believe at most, 3% in the party tanned their skin (can someone send me more info). Most probably can't be bothered even to buy a costume. Why make the big fuss? FT Indians are eager to pick a fight.

Recently, Singaporeans received a spate of accusation. Many of the plaintive are apparently FT Indians, who are drawn predominantly from the higher caste. AsiaOne reports as below, criticizing Singaporeans, with a strong biased in favor of Indians.

Several Chinese employees have drawn the ire of netizens after they posted up pictures of themselves with their faces painted black and dressed in Indian traditional attires, presumably for a Bollywood-themed occasion...

They were quickly slammed for being offensive. 'Blackface' is widely seen as being racist, especially in the US. The term originated from the theatrical black make-up light-skinned performers used to wear to act out caricature performances of an African American person.....

Many FT Indians are found on the internet describing themselves being "hurt", "offended", "disturbed" with all kinds of self-victimization you can only find in the worst crackpot feminist. They then continue of accuse the most tolerant Singaporean Chinese of racism.

High caste Indians are the worst racist in the whole universe
Why FT Indian perceive darker complexion as an insult? The answer is they are the worst racist in the whole universe discriminating the dark skin people. The high caste Indians are those descendent of bunch fair skin Aryan gangsters, who wondered out of their Central Asia steppe. These wicked and uncivilized bandits descended on the plains of Indus and Ganges, proceeded to forcibly subjugate the native dark skin Dravidians, who were then the most clever people in the world.

These descendants of dark skin Dravidians later known as Dalits, are today the most despised and lowest IQ people in India, due to millennium of marginalization by Aryans. Today, Dalits work as shit collectors, prostitutes and doing all the most miserable jobs no matter how clever they are. Besides, Aryan uses rape as an institution against the lower caste. Millions of Dalits women have been raped every year.

Indians' skin color

You can see that Tamil Nadu and Kerela where ancestors of local Indians hailed are as black as Africa. So to all these FT racist scumbag, who is the real racist?
Roughly 30% of Indians are Dravidian that have dark skin and 20% of Aryanized Dravidian are dark as well. Despite of a significant number of Indians of darker skin color, that in actual fact, occupied a larger geographical area than the fairer skin Aryans, the insane FT Indians still insist that describing Indians having dark skin is an insult. 

This crazy self-victimization are against the fact that even in India today, the lighter skin high caste Indians are minority, while the darker skin Indians are majority and living on a greater area. Mathematically, to dress up as a Indian, putting a darker skin is closer to reality than making up like a Snow White.

What does it means when one in Indian costume wears dark skin?
The worst scumbag racist Indian Aryans hate people to wear Indian costume and colored their skin dark. To the high caste Indians, only sub-human that is worse than animal, has dark skin color.

Why Singaporeans perceive Indians having dark skin
There are historical reasons that Singaporeans tanned themselves when making up as Indians. First, majority of local Indians, probably up to more than 90% are low caste Indians, that have dark skin color. The first wave of Indian migration to Singapore consisted mainly of lower caste poverty stricken southern Indians, who indentured themselves.

Next, very few Singaporeans has travelled to places like Punjab or Haryana where they got a chance to meet the descendants of savage white Aryans. Even fewer bankers in UOB actually understand the historical and societal context of India. Most did not major in Indian history. 

Base on the experience growing up with our Indian friends, it would be crazy for someone here to paint themselves like a albino, the ideal skin color for FT Indians. So whats the big deal when I dress up myself like Sivalingam next door when there is a masquerade party?

FT Indians go home
Today, the new wave of Indians consist mainly of the higher caste, that have fairer skin. The UOB Bollywood theme event served as a catalyst for FT Indians to show their racism and superiority against Singaporeans.

These FT Indians conveniently ignore that fact that locals grown up with dark skin Indians, that they despise. They also choose to forget that they have just newly arrived and in the mindset of Singaporeans, most Indians have darker complexion. Once Singaporean Chinese tanned their skin wearing Indian costume, these worst racist scumbag accuse us of racism.

Since FT Indians feel so hurt and discriminated, they should go home. Save themselves from all these discriminations.

My further diagnosis of FT Indians. High caste Indians 3000 years old trick
FT Indians not only shown racism in workplace such as Citibank, kicking out every Chinese in CDP, today they went a step further, they accuse us of racism.

We must be vigilant of the dirty tricks FT Indians try to play by taking lessons from history.

When the Aryans plundered and raped the Dravidians that later became Dalits, they told them the following bullshit.

The Dalits deserve to be treated as outcasts because of their karma from bad deeds done in a previous life. Of course, in reality, they are no more or less deserving than any other human being of a good life but as long as they believe that they deserve their station in life they are less likely to agitate for changes that will impact the wealth of the ruling class.

So you're more likely to accept your place in the Status Quo as shit collector and prostitute than if you believe that you are miserable because you did something wrong in your past life.

Today, FT Indians try playing the worst racism on Singaporeans. They now accuse Singaporeans as racist with the help of MSM and PAP. Their persecution of Singaporeans will succeed only if we start believing that we have injured FT Indians and we must ease more and more of our rights-- maybe to the extend of collecting their shit, in order cleanse away our sin.

We must resist these racist in our deepest perseverance.

Tuesday, February 7, 2012

PAP attacking Singaporeans again 2

If you see a few similar scenarios described below played out in MSM, it usually means PAP will start hammering Singaporeans hard for the next few weeks. First, MSM will usually carry a report on aging Japan, which is nothing but mis-informations and half-truth. Next, some clowns from PAP will spew poison usually about something like if we do not accept more FT, we will be next Japan.

Then, a few more PAP clowns will jump out. Some acting as messengers for CEOs in Singapore accusing Singaporeans as the more lazy and most stupid in the whole universe. This time, Heng Swee Keat got this role as a clown.

Others will accuse Singaporeans being racist, xenophobic and remind us that our ancestors are FT as well.

All these idiots are playing the role of similar to somebody called John the Baptist. The PAP stooges are setting the stage for Kuan Yew. Finally, the old idiot appears, repeating his same old mantra again and again.

1) Singaporeans is going to be extinct if we do not accept FT. FT here to redeem Singaporeans.
2) FT is going to feed our old folks.
3) FT take care of our old.
4) FT create jobs for Singaporeans.
5) FT make Singapore vibrant
6) Singapore is "too big" and population "too small", we need more people
..ecetera, ecetera.....

Last few days, exactly the same old thing happened again. While Kuan Yew seems not to be bothered about other things, this FT policies appears to be the only thing he is not able completely hands off. All PAP's John the Baptist and FT advocators have shown to certain extend fatique in all these lyings, only Kuan Yew is still passionate.

Hence, it seems Kuan Yew, more than the rest is the mother FT policy, designed to screw Singaporeans.

Debunking FT policies
I am really sick for debunking PAP lies repeatedly for so many times. But since Kuan Yew did it again, I couldn't help but to repeated myself as well, else I am going to choke

My previous posting titled "Singaporean facing extinction: PAP's genocide explain" has the passages below.

Not true that every developed society will have low TFR
While its true that as a country prosper, fertility will drop, but experiences from other developed society has demonstrated that low fertility could be reversed. This includes countries like USA, New Zealand, Ireland, France, UK, Iceland...etc, which have fertility rate more or close to 2. In particular France and Iceland accomplish reasonable fertility rate through policies that providing adequate social service and support, as well as regulations to reduce social tensions.

How the genocide works
Our disappointing fertility rate has a lot to do with our stressful lifestyle, high indebtedness due to property and job insecurity. Instead, of improving the above social ills, PAP mass import foreigners, making the matter worse. Meanwhile PAP justify their immigration policies giving reasons that Singaporean are not producing. The relentless influx of foreigners acerbates the exact social ills that sterilize Singaporean.

And when Singapore's fertility rate drops further, PAP import even more foreigners. The vicious cycle goes on and on and it seems that PAP is targeting a fertility rate of zero for Singaporean. When Singaporean has zero baby, PAP can proudly give reasons why they need to import the whole world.

Singapore's demographic time bomb and hell in making
Even without further immigration, I estimate our population as follows.

Right now at 5 million population, Singapore population will peak at around 5.5 million in 15-20 years time, if current fertility rate of 1.16 continues. If Singapore improve its procreation to TFR of 2.1, which is the ideal case for population planner, our population probably will hit in 20-30 years to about 8-9 million and probably peak at even higher population further down.

In whatever outcome, Singapore's population is likely to explode further. Even if we hit the best outcome of 2.1 TFR, we will still be heading down to disaster of at least 8-9 million of population at a certain point of time. Then, Singapore will be extremely crowded. The property price will rocket stratospherically. At that time, the price of a 5 room HDB flat today may be just enough for a space for toilet bowl. Singapore will be worse than hell.

However, an import of millions more foreigners and a TFR of zero looks more like the outcome instead.

In The truth of aging society economics Part 1, I wrote.

Spreading fear that old man need people to look after
Recently, we have been receiving frequently bombardment of sinking into the despair aging society that only FT can bail us out. Old man are being described as some burden that requires the support from working adult.

My grandfather need my support?
But I really found it quite puzzling. I live with my grandfather who is 100x richer than me. He funded my university, gave me a Porsche the day I got my driving license and a condominium. Instead of me supporting the old, I think is the other way round as my grandfather is giving me S$10,000 every month. (fiction)

Aging society is a problem especially in Europe largely due to its pension system
In Europe, due to the pay as you go pension system, aging society would contributes to financial trouble. The old Europeans need wealth transfer from the productive young to survive. In Europe, the old has little savings.

Singapore's old people is a gold mine
As long as the old are able to support themselves, they behave like a gold mine. Due to the CPF system, and high saving rates, "in theory" the more people ages the better in some cases.

Instead of transferring wealth from the workers to the old, the reverse happen. The old would start spending on health care, leisure...etc all out of their own pockets creating plenty of jobs for the young people.

Best scenario is the old found themselves so much monies that they actually transfer their wealth to the young as gift, just like my grandfather did to me. Even some of the poor old Singaporeans did not burden anybody. They work hard no matter how miserable the wages. Others indeed rely on their offsprings or society for support.

In the next decades, all Singaporeans are expected to retire with either CPF or housing assets. So, we should not have a serious aging issue. In practice, we have a problem. (will discuss in part 2, you guess who sabotage us)

In many countries, retirement is a big business
Countries like Thailand are destinations for retirees from Japan and western countries. The more old men coming to Thailand, the better for them. The old retirees stimulate consumption and create jobs. Many old men took young Thai wives and when they died, huge amount of wealth are transferred to their Thai wives.

Kuan Yew stated that "there would not be enough people to look after the old and work the economy at the same time". In theory, 100% of the productive adult in a country can work just to take care of the rich retirees and do nothing else. It itself is a lucrative business.

So is aging society good or bad?
Aging society economics is paradoxical. In addition the elites do not want you to understand the subjects. Part 2 will further explain.

I also wrote that its deceptive to say FT support the old. The FT does not transfer directly a single cent to the old in the tax system. The transfer to the old take place if FT rent a house from our old folks, anyway, this benefit the elites and landlord more than the old.

We do not need FT (talent) or migrant to look after the old, just a few maid will do. No Singaporeans ever oppose importing maid.

I have to stop now even though I have not yet finished the write up. PAP's madness affect me badly when I was writing this blog.

Sunday, February 5, 2012

PAP attacking Singaporeans again 1

During these few days, Singaporeans are bombarded by MSM, accusing us stupid, and praising foreigners and racist FT as clever. It is really quite disheartening to find that many of our youngsters have subscribed to these lies and instead of attributing to rampant racism as a cause of their employment predicament, they start blaming their own stupidity.

Aisa1 threw a spate of Molotov cocktail against Singaporeans as followBANK executive Mark Tan considers himself a minority in the Singapore-based foreign bank where he works.

It isn't because he is a member of a specialised team that sells and services e-commerce trading platforms.

It is because Mr Tan, 31, is one out of only five Singaporeans in the 12-man team. The rest are Employment Pass (EP) holders from Britain, Germany, India and the Philippines.

How special and talented is this Mark Tan? Doing sales at age of 31, how many lines of code, different OS platform and computer languages has he got in his belt. Same thing applies to the rest of his team members. There are many expert Singaporeans that has coded millions of lines, and gone through many different system than that Mark Tan. I do not know on what basis does AsiaOne form such opinion that Singaporeans lack such skill sets.

Next, how complex is the e-commerce trading platform that those chaps are selling? How many lines of code it contains? I bet with you a Windows OS on the shelves of any IT shop is at least 1000 times more complicated, code size 1000 times bigger, employing 1000 times more development engineers, than that junk platform. If a simple sales girl can sell Windows OS, it is puzzling that AsiaOne suggests only Mark Tan + 4 out of more than 3 million Singaporeans is cut to sell that crap e-platform.

"In foreign banks, Singaporeans usually occupy the operational roles, while most of the trading and sales positions are occupied by foreigners," he said.

Singaporeans are unable to fill these roles as they lack the niche skill sets and experience, observed Ms Axer Goh, manager of the contracting division at professional recruitment consultancy Robert Walters Singapore.......

But Singaporean executives are not being squeezed out of these white-collar jobs by foreigners, say industry observers and the Singapore Business Federation (SBF).

The truth is that there aren't enough talented Singaporeans to go around yet.

"Within the financial-services industry, the pool of Singaporeans with prior knowledge in market risk and valuation, or exposure to exotic products within trading desks remains limited and requires a longer period to mature," explained Ms Goh......

The above joker Axer Goh is really shameless and wicked. The most useless traders here in Singapore are those foreigners who have caused spectacular blown up. Rogue traders Nick Leeson and Chen Jiulin are both foreigners. In fact, "talent" like Nick Leeson did not even had a university degree. Chen Jiulin had no background in finance.

He cited Norwegian solar-energy specialist firm REC, which opened a $2.5- billion production facility in Tuas in November 2010, and wind-energy solutions firm Vestas.

He said: "These are newfound sectors that need newfound skill sets. Universities and institutions may not have produced such a niche curriculum to cater to their needs."

Mr Yim said: "With regard to the lack of skill sets in such highly specialised portfolios, this issue will persist for at least the next two to three years. It takes time for (potential employees) to acquire certain skill sets."

I am sick on further debunking these lies. For example, if you look at the profile of Vestas FTs, I cannot see any salient skill sets that distinguish them apart from the local for the majority of them. Nevertheless, a small number of them are quite good. Go search these folks at Linkedin.

Today in Singapore, the most important thing in not your capability, but whether can you find a patron. At the same time, the MSM promotes discriminations against Singaporeans by accusing us of being lack of talent.

Friday, February 3, 2012

What Toh Chin Chye really did for Singapore?

A few days ago, former PAP minister cum co-founder Toh Chin Chye kicked the bucket. From the MSM, I gather the impression that other than holding the most insignificant portfolio like Minister for Science and Technology and Minister for Health, Toh basically did nothing.

Among the 1st generation PAP leaders, we all knew Rajaratnam spearheaded foreign affairs. Goh Keng Swee destroyed Singapore well-being in the long run by ruining domestic capital and set up the abominable GIC with Jewish Rothschild shylock. We knew Lim Kim San put Singaporeans into debt by forcing us to stay in HDB. That given a choice, most would prefer to stay in the worst slum than PAP's HDB barrack. We knew Kuan Yew cannot do any good things but ISA, FT polices, property ponzi....etc.

But what did Toh Chin Chye did, that make him stand side by side with Raja and Goh, and even ahead of Lim Kim San?

Toh Chin Chye was the kingmaker
Toh was beholden to Kuan Yew because he re-created PAP modelling after tyrannical Lenin's Communist Party. This helped Kuan Yew to consolidate power by suppressing grassroot democracy.

According to wikipedia, The election of the CEC through the PAP cadre system has been described as a "closed system" in which "the cardinals appoint the pope and the pope appoints the cardinals. The PAP's organisational structure has Leninist roots whereby a group of elite PAP members known as cadres elect 18 CEC members from a list of candidates. Originally when this structure was organised in 1957, the outgoing committee recommended a list of candidates for the next CEC. This has been changed recently so that the CEC nominates eight members and the party caucus selects the remaining ten.

The cadre system was started in 1957 by Toh Chin Chye, in an effort to prevent the popular leftist faction of the PAP, which dominated the early Party at the grassroots level and many of its committees, and composed much of its early membership, from ever taking control of the CEC again.

Before 1957, every party member could vote in CEC elections. However on August 9 1957, the leftists took control of the CEC, and the original founders (the "Peranakan Circle") lost control. After Lim Yew Hock, cracked down on many of the leftist leaders in the CEC in 1957 (as well as many non-PAP leftist leaders in general), the Peranakan Circle regained control of the CEC.

CNA today wrote that, in a tribute years later, Mr Lee Kuan Yew said without Dr Toh holding the fort in the PAP, the party might never have held together. Lee was wrong, without Toh, the party would still exist but Kuan Yew would most likely not become the PM.

Toh had few occasions to become PM but he supported Kuan Yew. He supported Kuan Yew in all the inflexion points.

To conclude, Toh did nothing for our country, or rather his works were mostly destructive. He has such a high standing in PAP because without him, Kuan Yew would almost certainly not ascend to power. And his destruction of party democracy means Kuan Yew is able to have a iron grip of the party for as long as he like.

Toh was spurned by Kuan Yew
He was not given any significant portfolio. He watched and saw all his PAP buddies rotating in and out of prestigious appointments such as defence, finance, foreign affairs....etc.

After doing running dog for Kuan Yew, he was kicked out mercilessly, in all major projects of nation building. This is the reason till this date, no one can tell what Toh really does. He was just a spent stepping stone.

Wednesday, February 1, 2012

Kuan Yew Bio 6: Oei Tjiong Ham, the boss of Kuan Yew's grandfather

Oei Tjiong Ham
Over the years, PAP government under Kuan Yew has been de-emphasizing the study of history. Even if Singapore history is taught, the content must be studied superficially, littered with mis-informations, half-truth and deliberate omission.

In my previous post, I wrote about Kuan Yew's grandfather Lee Hoon Leong. He ran the shipping business, Heap Eng Moh Steamship, rising to CEO for the biggest opium cultivator in the whole south east Asia, Oei Tjiong Ham.

Semarang Alumni
Oei was the richest man in south east Asia, hailed from Semarang, Java, Indonesia. Many in Singapore are not aware of the the real extend of power of Semarang peranakans in our country. Kwa Siew Tee, the father of Kwa Geok Choo was born in Semarang and environ. Kuan Yew's paternal grandmother, Ko Liem Neo was from Semarang, who was taken as a minor wife there, by married man Lee Hoon Leong.

Lee Hoon Leong enjoyed his young minor wife 10 years his junior in Semarang, out of sight of his Singapore spouse Mark Hup Sin at first, until after the birth of their first son Lee Chin Koon. Lee Chin Koon, Kuan Yew's dad was born in Semarang and brought in as FT to Singapore.

About Oei Tjiong Ham
Among so many talented Chinese in Indonesia, Oei was able to stand out due to his business in opium. Between 1890 and 1904, Oei made a profit of 18 million guilders from the opium trade alone. During that period, Oei Tiong Ham became a major opium license holder in Central and East Java (in Semarang, Yogyakarta, Surakar-ta, and Surabaya). He also owned the largest opium farms.

With astronomical profits from opium, Oei was able to build Oei Tiong Ham Concern (OTHC), the largest conglomerate in south east Asia the early 20th century. Its flagship was Kian Gwan, which Oei inherited from his father in 1890.

Apart from opium, Oei also became famous as the "sugar king" as well. Among its subsidiary, there was this Heap Eng Moh Steamship Company Ltd, where Kuan Yew's granddaddy was running.

Opium and Kuan Yew
Today,anyone caught 1.2kg of opium, 15g of heroin, 30g of morphine will be sent to gallows. The sentence is harsh. Ironically, Kuan Yew's grandfather prospered by working for Oei who had been the biggest opium dealer in south east Asia.

Places in Singapore and building in NUS still carries name of Oei Tjiong Ham.

Oei family in Singapore
Daughter Oei Hui Lan wrote that of his father "All his life he had great interest in women and sex. He had 18 acknowledged concubines and a total of 42 children by them"

Oei relocated to Singapore in early 1920s where he died in 1924. His empire soon vanished under nationalism after Indonesia's independent.

Mavis Oei
Arguably only Kian Gwan Thailand manages to survive while Kian Gwan Singapore office long felt into oblivion. Despite of this, the Oei family in Singapore remains extremely powerful without attracting very much attention nowadays.

Son Oei Tjong Ie was the Chairman and one of the founder of Maybank, the largest bank in Malaysia. The family holds substantial stake in OCBC. Ie's son Humphey Oei Ing Tjien married Mavis Khoo daughter of Singapore No 1 richest Khoo Teck Puat.